梵二精神

看到一篇花邊報道，但對熱愛音樂的信友來說是個令人悲哀的消息。 英國作曲家兼指揮 麥美倫爵士 (Sir James Macmillan) 在最近的一篇 文章 說，他放棄再寫禮儀音樂。他說： This has sometimes led to tensions. The professionalising of music in church is sometimes regarded with suspicion by clerics and laypeople dedicated to the “modernising” and “democratisation” of religious idea and practice, nervous of the alienating resonances of old-fashioned, hierarchical “elitism”. The churches went through their 1960s revolutions too, and in some things these were necessary and liberating. The musical fallout from these has been problematic, though, especially to those involved in maintaining high standards. This has been especially dire in the Catholic Church, where deliberately misapplied readings of “the spirit of Vatican II” has turned much of the musical practice in liturgy into a pitiful laughing stock. Anglicans will know what the problem is too — those aisle-dancing and numbskull jogging for Jesus choruses, maudlin sentimental dirges, faux American folk music and cod-Celticness. The American musicologist Thomas Day described this kind of liturgy as “a diet of romantic marshmallows indigestibly combined with stuff that grabs you by the scruff of the neck and shakes you into submission with its social message”. 大意就是說，一些志於「現代化」及「民主化」宗教理念及習俗的神職及平信徒，對教會內的專業化音樂抱有質疑態度，認為這是古舊的精英主義。這在公教尤其嚴重，因為按「梵二精神」的錯誤閱讀使很多地方的音樂變得「可憐可笑」。

“我們在這裡將繼續研讀教宗本篤十六世於2005年給教廷成員的聖誕講辭。 本篤十六世：我希望反省的今年最後的一件事情是， 梵蒂岡第二次大公會議閉幕40周年的慶祝。這回憶提出一個問題：這大公會議的結果是甚麼？它有被良好地接納嗎？在承認大公會議的前題下，甚麼是做得好的而甚麼是不足或做錯了的？有甚麼還未做嗎？沒有人能否認在教會大部分地方，大公會議的推行都有點困難，都不希望就如一個偉大的教會聖師聖巴西略在尼西亞大公會議後所，形容那數年間所發生的情況：聖巴西略將教會的情況比喻為在黑暗中風暴的一場海軍戰事，這樣說：「互不同意的刺耳呼聲此起彼落，那聽不明白的耳語、沒有停止的爭吵發出令人混亂的嘈音差不多充斥著整個教會，以那些多餘的或錯誤的誤導著信仰的正確教義……」